Criticism of the National Health Service (England) > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) consists of problems such as gain access to, waiting lists, health care protection, and various scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the publicly funded health care system of England, developed under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour federal government of Clement Attlee. It has come under much criticism, specifically throughout the early 2000s, due to outbreaks of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the involvement of the NHS in scandals extends back several years, consisting of over the arrangement of mental healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (ultimately part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and overspends on medical facility newbuilds, including Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which soared from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making healthcare a largely "undetectable cost" to the patient, health care seems to be successfully totally free to its customers - there is no particular NHS tax or levy. To decrease expenses and guarantee that everyone is treated equitably, there are a variety of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) functions as a primary gatekeeper - without a referral from a GP, it is frequently impossible to gain greater courses of treatment, such as a consultation with an expert. These are argued to be needed - Welshman Bevan noted in a 1948 speech in your house of Commons, "we shall never have all we need ... expectations will constantly surpass capability". [2] On the other hand, the national medical insurance systems in other countries (e.g. Germany) have dispensed with the requirement for referral; direct access to an expert is possible there. [3]

There has been issue about opportunistic "health tourists" taking a trip to Britain (primarily London) and utilizing the NHS while paying nothing. [4] British citizens have actually been understood to travel to other European countries to benefit from lower costs, and due to the fact that of a worry of hospital-acquired extremely bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS gain access to is for that reason controlled by medical concern instead of rate system, leading to waiting lists for both consultations and surgery, as much as months long, although the Labour government of 1997-onwards made it among its key targets to decrease waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation might be 2 years; there were ambitions to lower it to 18 weeks regardless of opposition from physicians. [6] It is objected to that this system is fairer - if a medical grievance is intense and deadly, a patient will reach the front of the queue rapidly.

The NHS determines medical requirement in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), an approach of measuring the benefit of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this method of assigning healthcare means some patients must lose in order for others to get, and that QALY is a crude method of making life and death choices. [8]

Hospital acquired infections

There have been several deadly outbreaks of antibiotic resistant germs (" very bugs") in NHS healthcare facilities, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has led to criticism of requirements of hygiene across the NHS, with some clients buying personal medical insurance or travelling abroad to avoid the viewed danger of catching a "super bug" while in hospital. However, the department of health vowed ₤ 50 million for a "deep clean" of all NHS England healthcare facilities in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The lack of accessibility of some treatments due to their viewed poor cost-effectiveness sometimes results in what some call a "postcode lotto". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the first gatekeeper, and take a look at the cost of all drugs. Until they have issued assistance on the expense and efficiency of new or expensive medicines, treatments and treatments, NHS services are not likely to use to fund courses of treatment. The same of real of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's counterpart in Scotland. [13]

There has actually been considerable debate about the public health funding of pricey drugs, notably Herceptin, due to its high cost and perceived limited overall survival. The project waged by cancer victims to get the federal government to spend for their treatment has gone to the greatest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it accredited. [14] [15] Your House of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug companies for bringing in drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limit that is considered the maximum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the idea of personal finance effort (PFI) pertained to prominence, all brand-new hospital structure was by convention moneyed from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise cash and able to manage public sector expense. In June 1994, the Capital Expense Manual (CIM) was released, setting out the regards to PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital jobs (structure of brand-new facilities) had to take a look at whether PFI was more effective to utilizing public sector funding. By the end of 1995, 60 relatively little jobs had been prepared for, at an overall expense of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, structures were constructed and serviced by the economic sector, and after that rented back to the NHS. The Labour government elected under Tony Blair in 1997 embraced PFI projects, believing that public costs required to be cut. [16]

Under the personal financing initiative, an increasing variety of health centers have actually been built (or rebuilt) by private sector consortia, although the government also motivated private sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has been substantial criticism of this, with a research study by a consultancy business which works for the Department of Health revealing that for every single ₤ 200 million invested in independently funded health centers the NHS loses 1000 medical professionals and nurses. The very first PFI medical facilities contain some 28% less beds than the ones they changed. [18] Along with this, it has been noted that the return for building companies on PFI agreements might be as high as 58%, and that in financing hospitals from the personal instead of public sector cost the NHS almost half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several prominent medical scandals have actually occurred within the NHS over the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised elimination, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including kids's organs, between 1988 and 1995. The main report into the event, the Redfern Report, revealed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had bought the "dishonest and unlawful removing of every organ from every child who had had a postmortem." In reaction, it has actually been argued that the scandal brought the issue of organ and tissue donation into the public domain, and highlighted the benefits to medical research that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s regarded opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s concerned abnormally high death rates among clients at the health center. [22] [23] As much as 1200 more clients died in between 2005 and 2008 than would be anticipated for the type and size of healthcare facility [24] [25] based on figures from a death design, but the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misleading to connect the inadequate care to a particular number or variety of varieties of deaths. [26] A public questions later on exposed several circumstances of disregard, incompetence and abuse of clients. [27]

" Lack of independence of checking for security and physical fitness for function"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have actually degenerated health care, NHS England is run on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with examining if the care delivered by the NHS is truly safe and suitable for function is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC describes itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it remains in reality "liable to the public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its funding originates from the taxpayer. At least one chairman, one chief executive [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have actually been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is therefore the potential for a dispute of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the very same leadership and both are extremely prone to political interference.

In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins advised NHS England to focus on proof and safety in gender dysphoria treatment following concerns raised by the Cass Review. NHS demanded cooperation from adult clinics and started a review, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum slammed limitations on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall welcomed the evaluation's focus on kids's wellness. [28] [29]

See also

National Health Service
List of health centers in England
Healthcare in the United Kingdom
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The General Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the original on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of coordinated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: outcomes of a regular data analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher rules to make sure that individuals do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health travelers could get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors assault Blair's waiting list pledge". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the initial on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the initial on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do health centers make you sick?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleansing under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lottery game'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the initial on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug rejected for NHS use". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the initial on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to perform thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the original on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI hospitals 'costing NHS additional ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances required for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport health center deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, watchdog states". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding errors 'should be criminal offense'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'might have caused 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford healthcare facility scandal: Approximately 1,200 might have died over "shocking" patient care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "How many people died "unnecessarily" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit medical facility gets away interrogation". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister informs NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult clinics". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England need to end 'culture of secrecy' in children's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links

NHS.


Further reading

Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.