Criticism of the National Health Service (England) > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes issues such as access, waiting lists, healthcare protection, and numerous scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the openly financed healthcare system of England, developed under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour government of Clement Attlee. It has actually come under much criticism, specifically during the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the participation of the NHS in scandals extends back lots of years, consisting of over the arrangement of psychological health care in the 1970s and 1980s (eventually part of the factor for the Mental Health Act 1983), and overspends on healthcare facility newbuilds, consisting of Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which shot up from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making healthcare a mostly "undetectable cost" to the patient, healthcare seems to be successfully complimentary to its consumers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To reduce costs and guarantee that everybody is dealt with equitably, there are a variety of "gatekeepers." The general professional (GP) operates as a main gatekeeper - without a recommendation from a GP, it is frequently impossible to acquire greater courses of treatment, such as a visit with a specialist. These are argued to be required - Welshman Bevan noted in a 1948 speech in your house of Commons, "we will never ever have all we require ... expectations will always go beyond capacity". [2] On the other hand, the national health insurance systems in other nations (e.g. Germany) have actually done without the requirement for recommendation; direct access to an expert is possible there. [3]

There has actually been concern about opportunistic "health tourists" travelling to Britain (primarily London) and utilizing the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British residents have actually been understood to travel to other European countries to take advantage of lower expenses, and since of a worry of hospital-acquired super bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS gain access to is for that reason controlled by medical top priority instead of cost mechanism, causing waiting lists for both consultations and surgical treatment, up to months long, although the Labour federal government of 1997-onwards made it one of its key targets to reduce waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation might be 2 years; there were ambitions to reduce it to 18 weeks regardless of opposition from medical professionals. [6] It is contested that this system is fairer - if a medical problem is acute and deadly, a client will reach the front of the line quickly.

The NHS determines medical need in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a technique of measuring the advantage of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this approach of allocating healthcare means some clients need to lose out in order for others to acquire, which QALY is a crude method of making life and death decisions. [8]

Hospital obtained infections

There have actually been numerous fatal outbreaks of antibiotic resistant bacteria (" super bugs") in NHS hospitals, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has resulted in criticism of standards of hygiene across the NHS, with some clients purchasing private medical insurance or taking a trip abroad to prevent the perceived danger of catching a "very bug" while in healthcare facility. However, the department of health pledged ₤ 50 million for a "deep tidy" of all NHS England hospitals in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The absence of availability of some treatments due to their viewed poor cost-effectiveness sometimes results in what some call a "postcode lotto". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the very first gatekeeper, and analyze the cost efficiency of all drugs. Until they have actually released guidance on the expense and effectiveness of brand-new or expensive medicines, treatments and treatments, NHS services are unlikely to provide to fund courses of treatment. The same of real of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's counterpart in Scotland. [13]

There has been considerable controversy about the general public health financing of expensive drugs, significantly Herceptin, due to its high cost and perceived minimal general survival. The project waged by cancer sufferers to get the federal government to pay for their treatment has gone to the greatest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it licensed. [14] [15] Your House of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug companies for generating drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limit that is thought about the maximum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the idea of private financing initiative (PFI) came to prominence, all new healthcare facility structure was by convention moneyed from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise money and able to control public sector expense. In June 1994, the Capital Investment Manual (CIM) was published, setting out the terms of PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital projects (structure of brand-new facilities) had to look at whether PFI was more effective to utilizing public sector funding. By the end of 1995, 60 reasonably small projects had actually been prepared for, at a total cost of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, structures were constructed and serviced by the private sector, and then leased back to the NHS. The Labour federal government elected under Tony Blair in 1997 welcomed PFI tasks, thinking that public costs required to be cut. [16]

Under the personal finance initiative, an increasing number of health centers have actually been developed (or rebuilt) by personal sector consortia, although the federal government also encouraged economic sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been significant criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy company which works for the Department of Health showing that for every single ₤ 200 million invested on independently funded hospitals the NHS loses 1000 doctors and nurses. The first PFI medical facilities contain some 28% fewer beds than the ones they changed. [18] Along with this, it has been kept in mind that the return for building companies on PFI agreements could be as high as 58%, and that in funding healthcare facilities from the personal rather than public sector cost the NHS practically half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several prominent medical scandals have happened within the NHS throughout the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised elimination, retention, and disposal of human tissue, consisting of kids's organs, in between 1988 and 1995. The main report into the occurrence, the Redfern Report, revealed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had bought the "unethical and unlawful stripping of every organ from every kid who had had a postmortem." In action, it has been argued that the scandal brought the concern of organ and tissue donation into the general public domain, and highlighted the advantages to medical research study that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s related to opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s worried abnormally high death rates among clients at the medical facility. [22] [23] As much as 1200 more clients died in between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of medical facility [24] [25] based on figures from a mortality design, but the last Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misguiding to connect the inadequate care to a particular number or range of varieties of deaths. [26] A public inquiry later revealed multiple instances of overlook, incompetence and abuse of patients. [27]

" Lack of independence of checking for security and fitness for purpose"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have actually devolved healthcare, NHS England is run on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with examining if the care provided by the NHS is genuinely safe and suitable for function is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC explains itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it remains in reality "liable to the public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its financing originates from the taxpayer. At least one chairman, one chief executive [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have actually been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is therefore the potential for a dispute of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the very same leadership and both are highly susceptible to political disturbance.

In April 2024, Victoria Atkins advised NHS England to prioritize proof and safety in gender dysphoria treatment following issues raised by the Cass Review. NHS demanded cooperation from adult clinics and initiated an evaluation, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum slammed restrictions on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall welcomed the evaluation's concentrate on kids's well-being. [28] [29]

See also

National Health Service
List of medical facilities in England
Healthcare in the UK
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The General Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the initial on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of coordinated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: outcomes of a regular information analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher rules to guarantee that people do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health travelers could get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors assault Blair's waiting list promise". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the initial on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the initial on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do hospitals make you sick?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleaning under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lottery'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the original on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug rejected for NHS usage". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to perform thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the initial on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI medical facilities 'costing NHS additional ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances required for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport medical facility deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, guard dog states". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding errors 'ought to be criminal offense'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'might have led to 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford hospital scandal: Up to 1,200 might have passed away over "stunning" patient care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "The number of people died "needlessly" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit hospital gets away cross-examination". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister informs NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult clinics". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England need to end 'culture of secrecy' in kids's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links